Through the Global Collections Program, we foster national and international relationships related to biometrics in support of counterterrorism and other law enforcement efforts. ![]() However, important additional biometrics-related work is being undertaken by the FBI Laboratory, such as DNA activities, while voice and face recognition initiatives are being pursued in our Operational Technology Division. In addition to the PRSU, our Criminal Justice Information Services Division-with its vast repositories of fingerprints and biographical data-is the FBI’s natural focus for identity management activities. The Bureau’s Science and Technology Branch created the Programs Research and Standards Unit (PRSU) to strengthen our ability to combat crime and terrorism with state-of-the-art biometrics technology. It has used various forms of biometric identification since our earliest days, including assuming responsibility for managing the national fingerprint collection in 1924. The FBI has long been a leader in biometrics. Over the years, the FBI and its partners in the law enforcement and intelligence communities have used biometrics not only to authenticate an individual’s identity (you are who are say you are), but more importantly, to figure out who someone is (by a fingerprint left on a murder weapon or a bomb, for example), typically by scanning a database of records for a match. In an effort to harness new technologies and improve identifications, the Bureau developed its Next Generation Identification (NGI) system, which provides the criminal justice community with the world's largest and most efficient electronic repository of biometric and criminal history information. Fingerprints are a common biometric modality, but others include things like DNA, irises, voice patterns, palmprints, and facial patterns. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(5), 1023-1040.The FBI provides a variety of services, information, and training involving biometrics-the measurable biological (anatomical and physiological) or behavioral characteristics used for identification of an individual. On the preliminary psychophysics of fingerprint identification. Understanding expertise and non-analytic cognition in fingerprint discriminations made by humans. Human matching performance of genuine crime scene latent fingerprints. 37th Australasian Experimental Psychology Conference, Melbourne, VIC, Australia, (38-38). Cropper, Combined Abstracts of 2010 Australian Psychology Conferences. Expertise in matching fingerprints and faces. The nature of expertise in fingerprint matching: Experts can do a lot with a little. Generalization in fingerprint matching experiments. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 5(1), 23–23. Collective intelligence in fingerprint analysis. Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 45(3), 315-322. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 45(5), 573-584. How low can you go? Detecting style in extremely low-resolution images. The Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71(1), 32-39. Training perceptual experts: Feedback, labels, and contrasts. ![]() The style of a stranger: Identification expertise generalizes to coarser level categories. Journal of Applied Research in Memory & Cognition, 6(4), 442–451. The emergence of perceptual expertise with fingerprints over time. Expertise with unfamiliar objects is flexible to changes in task but not changes in class. Putting bias into context: The role of familiarity in identification. The effect of expertise, target usefulness and domain-specificity on visual search. An expert-novice comparison of feature choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 26(4), 671–691. An evidence accumulation model of perceptual discrimination with naturalistic stimuli. A., Persson, A., Ballard, T., & Thompson, M. The prevalence effect in fingerprint identification: match and non-match base-rates impact misses and false alarms. ![]() A guide to interpreting forensic testimony: Scientific approaches to fingerprint evidence. Fingerprint comparison and adversarialism: The scientific and historical evidence.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |